Welcome to the latest edition of The Waiting Room. This edition examines the evolving pressures shaping UK health policy, from NHS performance and workforce challenges to mental health reform and maternity care. Across each area, a consistent theme emerges: the tension between short-term delivery in the face of long-term system pressures and reform.
Pressure at the Front Door: Performance Targets and Public Confidence
The Department of Health and Social Care has highlighted a marked improvement in public sentiment, with the latest British Social Attitudes survey showing the largest fall in NHS dissatisfaction since 1998. The Government and the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care Wes Streeting, have attributed this shift to increased investment, falling waiting lists, and early signs of reform, alongside the launch of a targeted recovery programme for underperforming trusts.
However, this improvement in public perception sits alongside continued operational underperformance and challenges. The NHS remains short of key waiting time targets, with 61.5% of patients receiving non-urgent treatment within 18 weeks in January 2026, below the 65% interim target. Alongside concerns about delayed care, this persistent gap between ambition and delivery is becoming increasingly politically significant.
Reforms to referral pathways, particularly the expanded use of “advice and guidance” (A&G), have also become an area of discussion. These are intended to manage demand by encouraging GPs to consult specialists before referring patients and the Government is aiming for 25% of GP referrals for key issue areas to be 'diverted' back to GPs by 2027.
However, opposition parties are criticising this move to ‘ration’ NHS referrals, suggesting it may act as a gatekeeping mechanism, and potentially limiting access to specialist care while improving headline performance metrics.
The tension between improving sentiment and lagging performance underscores a broader policy challenge. Public confidence in both the NHS and the Government depends not only on direction of travel but on whether targets are seen as credible and consistently met. Continued underperformance risks undermining recent gains in satisfaction, raising questions about whether current reforms address underlying capacity constraints or primarily manage their visibility.
From Crisis to Capacity: Mental Health and the Limits of Prevention
Demand for mental health services remains high, with over 2.2 million people contacting services in January 2026 and more than 550,000 children and young people on waiting lists in England. Around 30% of these young people have been waiting over two years for care.
The Government has responded with increased investment, including £473 million in funding and the recruitment of 7,000 additional staff, alongside a shift towards community-based care. These measures align with a broader objective of linking health outcomes to economic participation, particularly among younger people, and wider welfare reforms.
However, while capacity is being expanded, some argue less progress has been made in addressing the root causes of poor mental health. Within this, growing attention has focused on the role of digital environments, particularly social media use among young people. While evidence of the impact of social media on mental health is mixed, the Government is currently consulting on measures to better protect young people online, including a potential under-16s social media ban.
This reflects the growing salience of these discussions in both health and wider policy debates, and a balance being struck between immediate interventions alongside more complex preventative measures - the impact of which may take longer to materialise.
A Workforce under Strain: Ongoing Industrial Action
Efforts to improve NHS performance face renewed pressure despite signs of rising public confidence, with disruption from workforce challenges continuing to affect delivery. Recent reporting by The Times suggests that resident doctors’ strikes have cost the NHS more than £3 billion over the past three years, underlining the scale of ongoing industrial tensions.
In England, resident doctors recently went on strike for six days following a breakdown in negotiations between the Government and the British Medical Association (BMA). The action, part of a long-running dispute over pay, disrupted services through cancellations to planned treatments and the redeployment of senior clinicians to maintain emergency care. While the government maintains that recent pay awards are competitive, the BMA continues to argue that real-terms pay has declined significantly since 2008.
It is notable that the political rhetoric around the latest round of strikes hardened, with the Prime Minister threatening that the BMA could lose 1,000 planned training posts if strike action is not called off, and linking workforce expansion directly to the resolution of the dispute. The escalation in both financial and political stakes reflects the centrality of workforce issues to NHS recovery efforts. Ministers have framed the dispute not only as a question of pay, but of system capacity, arguing that continued industrial action diverts funding and risks delaying improvements to waiting times. The BMA, by contrast, has linked pay restoration and expanded training capacity to long-term service sustainability, warning against trade-offs that could constrain future workforce supply.
The NHS emphasised that patients should continue to seek care throughout strike action, but the disruption represents a further setback on efforts to deliver sustained improvements in performance and waiting times, particularly at a point when Ministers are pointing to early signs of recovery.
Alongside industrial action, workforce planning challenges are becoming more pronounced. In Wales, newly qualified paramedics have been advised to seek employment abroad following a recruitment freeze linked to financial and operational constraints. Despite significant public investment in training, graduates are facing limited domestic opportunities, prompting criticism across the political spectrum and raising concerns about long-term workforce sustainability.
Taken together, these developments reinforce structural pressures across the NHS workforce across the UK. Beyond immediate disruption, they point to persistent issues around pay, staffing, and workforce planning. Without credible resolution, there is a risk that industrial action and staffing shortages will continue to become embedded features of the system, with ongoing implications for patient care and service performance.
Maternity inequalities
The Nursing and Midwifery Council describing racism in maternity care as a “national emergency” is a political signal as much as a health warning. The data from MBRRACE-UK highlights maternal mortality rates for black women remain more than double those of white women, with similarly stark disparities in stillbirth rates. These are entrenched, well-evidenced inequalities that resist easy political framing or short-term fixes.
The NMC has been clear that the evidence suggests racism within maternity services compounds existing problems and is committed to working with all universities offering midwifery education to better emphasise anti-racism and bias awareness within the teaching. However, addressing wider racial and gendered inequalities, which often intersect with one another, requires institutional change to deep rooted issues which can often seem intractable.
This reflects yet another issue within the UK’s maternity sector which has been a long-standing area of concern that the Government has taken action to address. It commissioned an independent national investigation into maternity and neonatal services in England, led by Baroness Amos, and recently announced a new Maternity and Neonatal Taskforce which will deliver urgent action on these recommendations.
A growing focus on these issues, particularly addressing inequalities embedded across the health sector, is certainly welcome but meaningfully tackling entrenched disparities will prove to be a significant undertaking.
Across these areas, the Government’s reform agenda remains ambitious but under pressure. While the strategic direction is clear, delivery continues to be constrained by competing demands, including workforce shortages, missed targets, and rising demand.
Efforts to advance priorities and wider areas of reform, such as tackling waiting lists, driving digital transformation and shifting to community-based care risk being slowed by these operational challenges, while short-term fixes may come at the expense of longer-term reform, particularly in prevention and workforce planning. For policymakers and providers, the key question is whether current reforms can translate into sustained improvement, or whether system pressures will continue to outpace delivery.
To find out more about how Atticus helps health organisations navigate the changing regulatory, legislative and media landscapes, get in touch with our team at health@atticuscomms.com to learn more about how we can support you.